9/11 – What Happened to the Passengers?

Click Here to Find Your Cell Phone or Accessories

9/11 reviewed – This video clip takes a look at proof of the unfeasibility of the air-borne cellular phone calls from the 9 passengers that were suggested on the Caller-ID's of the receivers as taped in FBI records. The technology for such calls did not exist in 2001 (refer to video clip summary). If the cellular phone calls could not have been made from the aircrafts airborne, where were they made from? If those mobile phone telephone calls were not made airborne, the "19-Hijacker Conspiracy theory Theory" is seriously damaged.

This video is a section of the excellent 5-hour 9/11 investigative film "September 11 – The New Pearl Harbor" by Massimo Mazzucco. For the full 5-hour movie (separated right into 3 parts) click the web links near the bottom.

Prior to 2004 cellular phone calls from fast high flying airplane were difficult because of the innovation after that in operation.

However in 2004 Qualcomm Incorporated revealed in a July 15, 2004 news release:
" American Airlines and Qualcomm Complete Examination Trip to Assess In-Cabin Mobile Phone Use" []:
" Qualcomm Incorporated … and American Airlines today successfully showed in-cabin voice interaction making use of commercially readily available CDMA smart phones on a commercial American Airlines airplane …
The proof-of-concept presentation trip came from the Dallas/Fort Well worth International flight terminal. Throughout the approximate two-hour trip, passengers were able to position and also obtain call and also text messages on their smart phones …' We delight in to have functioned so closely with American Airlines to complete this proof-of-concept demo for the in-flight use 3G CDNA modern technology,' claimed Dr. Irwin Jacobs, chairman and also Chief Executive Officer of Qualcomm …".

On 9/11, people receiving cell calls supposedly from the pirated aircraft reported the unusual clearness of the telephone calls – as if they were calling from the following room. Nonetheless, cellular phone hire the Qualcomm demo, "… was about the same as a routine cell call on the ground, other than the loud background noise on the MD-80 jet.".
[]
This lack of history noise can make one wonder if those cell calls were actually being placed from the within a pirated jetliner in flight.

There is evidence that Flight 77 and Flight 11 were not even arranged to fly on 9/11 … not that they were scheduled and consequently canceled – yet that a Trip 77 and also a Flight 11 were never ever arranged to begin with – passengers typically aren't scheduled on flights which do not exist.

Prior to sometime in 2004 the Bureau of Transportation Data (BTS) website for September 11, 2001 showed no document of a Trip 77 or a Trip 11 [Evidence that Flights AA 11 and also AA 77 Did Not Exist on September 11, 2001 -] After that, in 2004, Flight 11 and also Trip 77 were "included" to the BTS data for 9/11/2001 but they show no departure time neither an airplane tail number – this link includes a display capture of the "new" Trip 11 data:;.

Back in 2003 when the proof to invade Iraq was being pushed to obtain public assistance it seemed greater than a little bit dubious so I began looking into concerns then being aired about the 9/11 strikes – and this 9/11 flight scheduling anomaly came to light. When I went to the Bureau of Transport web site, I found the exact same info as received the links listed below:.

Trip 93 – UA: Newark, NJ– Newark International.

Flight 175 – UA: Boston, MA– Logan International.

Flight 11 – AA: Boston, MA– Logan International.

Trip 77 – AA: Washington, DC– Washington Dulles International.

September 11 – The New Pearl Harbor (Complete version) – Component 1 of 3.

September 11 – The New Pearl Harbor (Full variation) – Component 2 of 3.

September 11 – The New Pearl Harbor (Full version) – Component 3 of 3.

– 9/11 – Did Trip 77 Actually Crash into The Government? – 3 Conflicting "Official" Animations.

The docudrama on Donald Trump he aimed to reduce -.
Video clip Teaser -.

The Docudrama that Donald Trump wanted subdued – in 12 components -.

Complete size -.

9/11 - What Happened to the Passengers?

9/11 revisited - This video examines evidence of the impossibility of the airborne cell phone calls from the nine passengers that were indicated on the Caller-ID's of the recipients as recorded in FBI reports. The technology for such calls did not exist in 2001 (refer to video description). If the cell phone calls could not have been made from the planes in the air, where were they made from? If those cell phone calls were not made in the air, the "19-Hijacker Conspiracy Theory" is seriously damaged.

This video is a portion of the excellent 5-hour 9/11 investigative film "September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor" by Massimo Mazzucco. For the complete 5-hour film (separated into 3 parts) click the links at the bottom.

Prior to 2004 cell phone calls from fast high flying aircraft were impossible because of the technology then in use.

But in 2004 Qualcomm Incorporated announced in a July 15, 2004 press release:
"American Airlines and Qualcomm Complete Test Flight to Evaluate In-Cabin Mobile Phone Use" [ https://www.qualcomm.com/news/releases/2004/07/15/american-airlines-and-qualcomm-complete-test-flight-evaluate-cabin-mobile ]:
"Qualcomm Incorporated...and American Airlines today successfully demonstrated in-cabin voice communication using commercially available CDMA mobile phones on a commercial American Airlines aircraft...
The proof-of-concept demonstration flight originated out of the Dallas/Fort Worth International airport. During the approximate two-hour flight, passengers were able to place and receive phone calls and text messages on their mobile phones....'We are pleased to have worked so closely with American Airlines to complete this proof-of-concept demonstration for the in-flight use of 3G CDNA technology,' said Dr. Irwin Jacobs, chairman and CEO of Qualcomm..."

On 9/11, people receiving cell calls allegedly from the hijacked aircraft reported the unusual clarity of the calls - as if they were calling from the next room. However, cell phone calls in the Qualcomm demonstration, "...was about the same as a regular cell call on the ground, other than the loud background noise on the MD-80 jet."
[ http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/tech/wireless/2004-07-16-jet-phones_x.htm ]

This lack of background noise could make one wonder if those cell calls were really being placed from the inside of a hijacked jetliner in flight.

Remote controlled aircraft? - http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2008/AutopilotSystemsMonaghan.pdf

There is evidence that Flight 77 and Flight 11 were not even scheduled to fly on 9/11.....not that they were scheduled and subsequently canceled - but that a Flight 77 and a Flight 11 were never scheduled in the first place - passengers aren't booked on flights which do not exist.

Prior to sometime in 2004 the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) website for September 11, 2001 showed no record of a Flight 77 or a Flight 11[ Evidence that Flights AA 11 and AA 77 Did Not Exist on September 11, 2001 - http://www.serendipity.li/wot/aa_flts/aa_flts.htm ]. Then, in 2004, Flight 11 and Flight 77 were "added" to the BTS data for 9/11/2001 but they show no departure time nor an aircraft tail number - this link includes a screen capture of the "new" Flight 11 data: http://letsrollforums.com//happened-passengers-4-flights-t20496.html?s=8086c7378cb4c997adf4957221feb738&

Back in 2003 when the evidence to invade Iraq was being pushed to get public support it seemed more than a bit shady so I began looking into questions then being aired about the 9/11 attacks - and this 9/11 flight scheduling anomaly came to light. When I went to the Bureau of Transportation website, I found the same information as shown in the links below:

Flight 93 - UA: Newark, NJ — Newark International http://www.serendipity.li/wot/aa_flts/bts/ua93departure.htm

Flight 175 - UA: Boston, MA — Logan International http://www.serendipity.li/wot/aa_flts/bts/ua175departure.htm

Flight 11 - AA: Boston, MA — Logan International http://www.serendipity.li/wot/aa_flts/bts/aa11nondeparture.htm

Flight 77 - AA: Washington, DC — Washington Dulles International http://www.serendipity.li/wot/aa_flts/bts/aa77nondeparture.htm

September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor (Full version) - Part 1 of 3 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5ppQDmId9M

September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor (Full version) - Part 2 of 3 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ahPo6DiGp7Y

September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor (Full version) - Part 3 of 3 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=haVF4oUOFJE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3JK1zTuBTZI - 9/11 - Did Flight 77 Really Crash into The Pentagon? - 3 Conflicting "Official" Animations

The documentary on Donald Trump he tried to suppress -
Video Teaser - http://trumpthemovie.com/watch/

The Documentary that Donald Trump wanted suppressed - in 12 parts - http://whowhatwhy.org/2016/01/19/the-documentary-on-donald-trump-he-sued-to-suppress/

Full length - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkUFUkvNYAQ